Comments on: dominant logic http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/08/dominant-logic/ Designed in Brisbane by Tim Kastelle & John Steen Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:10:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: See Things Differently « Business Models « Innovation Leadership Network http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/08/dominant-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4535 See Things Differently « Business Models « Innovation Leadership Network Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:21:36 +0000 http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=424#comment-4535 [...] their future innovations. Organisations get stuck in particular business models that become their dominant logic – and this often prevents them from innovating [...] [...] their future innovations. Organisations get stuck in particular business models that become their dominant logic – and this often prevents them from innovating [...]

]]> By: Tim http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/08/dominant-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-957 Tim Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:52:19 +0000 http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=424#comment-957 Thanks Amber! I sent an article by Chesbrough on Xerox PARC to your gmail address... Thanks Amber! I sent an article by Chesbrough on Xerox PARC to your gmail address…

]]> By: Amber http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/08/dominant-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-956 Amber Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:34:08 +0000 http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=424#comment-956 I found your last paragraph really funny. :D I agree with you completely and have nothing at all to add to it. There is no upside to this business decision for anyone concerned. There is unlimited downside. What's also apparent is that you understand the reasoning behind the situation more thoroughly than Mr. Sutton appears to, too. It's a business model, and they can't see past their business model to a lot of things. If something is desirable, what could be the harm in offering it more cheaply? It's a very singular mindset that illustrates Wal-Mart's continuing lack of awareness of the complexity of the society and cultures they build, or attempt to build, near. I'm having trouble finding Chesbrough's thoughts on PARC, though. It seems he may have laid them out in a book - could you summarize? :) I found your last paragraph really funny. :D I agree with you completely and have nothing at all to add to it. There is no upside to this business decision for anyone concerned. There is unlimited downside.

What’s also apparent is that you understand the reasoning behind the situation more thoroughly than Mr. Sutton appears to, too. It’s a business model, and they can’t see past their business model to a lot of things. If something is desirable, what could be the harm in offering it more cheaply? It’s a very singular mindset that illustrates Wal-Mart’s continuing lack of awareness of the complexity of the society and cultures they build, or attempt to build, near.

I’m having trouble finding Chesbrough’s thoughts on PARC, though. It seems he may have laid them out in a book – could you summarize? :)

]]>