<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is Responsible for Innovation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/</link>
	<description>Designed in Brisbane by Tim Kastelle &#38; John Steen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovation posts of the week: Enough with the Freedom to Fail &#124; Game-Changer</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-10219</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation posts of the week: Enough with the Freedom to Fail &#124; Game-Changer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-10219</guid>
		<description>[...] John Tropea: Who is Responsible for Innovation? &#8221; Innovation Leadership Network (timkastelle.org)         Author: Jorge Comments:  View Comments Date: 12 Sep 2010  Categories: Must reads of the week Tags: businessweek, Creativity, design thinking, forbes, Harvard Business Review, Innovation, Leadership          blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = &#039;http://www.game-changer.net/2010/09/12/innovation-posts-of-the-week-enough-with-the-freedom-to-fail/ &#039;; var disqus_identifier = &#039;2267 http://www.game-changer.net/?p=2267&#039;; var disqus_container_id = &#039;disqus_thread&#039;; var disqus_domain = &#039;disqus.com&#039;; var disqus_shortname = &#039;bigthink&#039;; var disqus_title = &quot;Innovation posts of the week: Enough with the Freedom to Fail&quot;; var disqus_config = function () { var config = this; // Access to the config object /* All currently supported events: * preData — fires just before we request for initial data * preInit - fires after we get initial data but before we load any dependencies * onInit - fires when all dependencies are resolved but before dtpl template is rendered * afterRender - fires when template is rendered but before we show it * onReady - everything is done */ config.callbacks.preData.push(function() { // clear out the container (its filled for SEO/legacy purposes) document.getElementById(disqus_container_id).innerHTML = &#039;&#039;; }); config.callbacks.onReady.push(function() { // sync comments in the background so we don&#039;t block the page DISQUS.request.get(&#039;?cf_action=sync_comments&amp;post_id=2267&#039;); }); }; var facebookXdReceiverPath = &#039;http://www.game-changer.net/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#039;;   var DsqLocal = { &#039;trackbacks&#039;: [ ], &#039;trackback_url&#039;: &quot;http://www.game-changer.net/2010/09/12/innovation-posts-of-the-week-enough-with-the-freedom-to-fail/trackback/&quot; };   (function() { var dsq = document.createElement(&#039;script&#039;); dsq.type = &#039;text/javascript&#039;; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = &#039;http://&#039; + disqus_shortname + &#039;.&#039; + disqus_domain + &#039;/embed.js?pname=wordpress&amp;pver=2.48&#039;; (document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;head&#039;)[0] &#124;&#124; document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;body&#039;)[0]).appendChild(dsq); })(); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Tropea: Who is Responsible for Innovation? &#8221; Innovation Leadership Network (timkastelle.org)         Author: Jorge Comments:  View Comments Date: 12 Sep 2010  Categories: Must reads of the week Tags: businessweek, Creativity, design thinking, forbes, Harvard Business Review, Innovation, Leadership          blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = &#039;<a href="http://www.game-changer.net/2010/09/12/innovation-posts-of-the-week-enough-with-the-freedom-to-fail/" rel="nofollow">http://www.game-changer.net/2010/09/12/innovation-posts-of-the-week-enough-with-the-freedom-to-fail/</a> &#039;; var disqus_identifier = &#039;2267 <a href="http://www.game-changer.net/?p=2267&#039;" rel="nofollow">http://www.game-changer.net/?p=2267&#039;</a>; var disqus_container_id = &#039;disqus_thread&#039;; var disqus_domain = &#039;disqus.com&#039;; var disqus_shortname = &#039;bigthink&#039;; var disqus_title = &quot;Innovation posts of the week: Enough with the Freedom to Fail&quot;; var disqus_config = function () { var config = this; // Access to the config object /* All currently supported events: * preData — fires just before we request for initial data * preInit &#8211; fires after we get initial data but before we load any dependencies * onInit &#8211; fires when all dependencies are resolved but before dtpl template is rendered * afterRender &#8211; fires when template is rendered but before we show it * onReady &#8211; everything is done */ config.callbacks.preData.push(function() { // clear out the container (its filled for SEO/legacy purposes) document.getElementById(disqus_container_id).innerHTML = &#039;&#039;; }); config.callbacks.onReady.push(function() { // sync comments in the background so we don&#039;t block the page DISQUS.request.get(&#039;?cf_action=sync_comments&amp;post_id=2267&#039;); }); }; var facebookXdReceiverPath = &#039;<a href="http://www.game-changer.net/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#039;" rel="nofollow">http://www.game-changer.net/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#039;</a>;   var DsqLocal = { &#039;trackbacks&#039;: [ ], &#039;trackback_url&#039;: &quot;<a href="http://www.game-changer.net/2010/09/12/innovation-posts-of-the-week-enough-with-the-freedom-to-fail/trackback/&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://www.game-changer.net/2010/09/12/innovation-posts-of-the-week-enough-with-the-freedom-to-fail/trackback/&#038;quot</a>; };   (function() { var dsq = document.createElement(&#039;script&#039;); dsq.type = &#039;text/javascript&#039;; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = &#039;<a href="http://&#038;#039" rel="nofollow">http://&#038;#039</a>; + disqus_shortname + &#039;.&#039; + disqus_domain + &#039;/embed.js?pname=wordpress&amp;pver=2.48&#039;; (document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;head&#039;)[0] || document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;body&#039;)[0]).appendChild(dsq); })(); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mottershead</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-5001</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mottershead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-5001</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia defines innovation as a new way of doing something or &quot;new stuff that is made useful&quot;. It may refer to incremental and emergent or radical and revolutionary changes in thinking, products, processes, or organizations.

Many of the most successful companies of the 21st century have a culture of innovation and I believe that within that culture, innovation is everybody&#039;s responsibility. What can we learn from these companies like Apple, Google and Virgin? They have the customer at the centre of their organisations.

In order to achieve innovation you need two things in place.
1. A simple, common, organisation wide goal aligned to the customer success that everybody can work towards.
2. A framework to measure the level of  the level of changes and improvements.

How did these companies achieve their innovations? By looking at the customer experience, understanding the customer expectations and aligning their organisations to achieving successful customer outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia defines innovation as a new way of doing something or &#8220;new stuff that is made useful&#8221;. It may refer to incremental and emergent or radical and revolutionary changes in thinking, products, processes, or organizations.</p>
<p>Many of the most successful companies of the 21st century have a culture of innovation and I believe that within that culture, innovation is everybody&#8217;s responsibility. What can we learn from these companies like Apple, Google and Virgin? They have the customer at the centre of their organisations.</p>
<p>In order to achieve innovation you need two things in place.<br />
1. A simple, common, organisation wide goal aligned to the customer success that everybody can work towards.<br />
2. A framework to measure the level of  the level of changes and improvements.</p>
<p>How did these companies achieve their innovations? By looking at the customer experience, understanding the customer expectations and aligning their organisations to achieving successful customer outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-2862</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-2862</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for you input Marc.  I definitely agree with the comments about how to structure things when innovation is not routine.  Making the dedicated team responsible for building a process is a very sensible way to approach it - and I&#039;ve seen that work well for several firms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for you input Marc.  I definitely agree with the comments about how to structure things when innovation is not routine.  Making the dedicated team responsible for building a process is a very sensible way to approach it &#8211; and I&#8217;ve seen that work well for several firms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Sniukas</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Sniukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>ralph_ohr asked me to comment on this post. So here we go.

I think you need to start with looking at the innovation history of the company. If it&#039;s a routine process for them, then I&#039;d favor a decentralized approach. If it&#039;s something completely new, you need to start somewhere, and a dedicated innovation team seems to make sense. BUT, that team should not the in charge of developing and implementing new ideas. Rather it should be in charge of developing an approach to innovation and implementing the approach, educating the organization on it, delivering the message, etc. Pretty much like a change or strategy team: they are not in charge of doing it, but in setting it up and supporting the organization with implementing the change and the new strategy. Dedicated resources, yes, but only to drive the innovation process and making it a capability of the organization. At least if you want to make it everybody&#039;s job. I don&#039;t think innovation will work as a stuff function. Responsibility needs to be with the businesses. Although an Innovation Office can be made responsible for driving the innovation efforts. And don&#039;t forget to align your reward system...

It has also been argued that different types of innovation need different processes. So you should define what innovation outcomes you are looking for in the first place: product and services innovation, strategic innovation, business model innovation, operational innovation or management innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ralph_ohr asked me to comment on this post. So here we go.</p>
<p>I think you need to start with looking at the innovation history of the company. If it&#8217;s a routine process for them, then I&#8217;d favor a decentralized approach. If it&#8217;s something completely new, you need to start somewhere, and a dedicated innovation team seems to make sense. BUT, that team should not the in charge of developing and implementing new ideas. Rather it should be in charge of developing an approach to innovation and implementing the approach, educating the organization on it, delivering the message, etc. Pretty much like a change or strategy team: they are not in charge of doing it, but in setting it up and supporting the organization with implementing the change and the new strategy. Dedicated resources, yes, but only to drive the innovation process and making it a capability of the organization. At least if you want to make it everybody&#8217;s job. I don&#8217;t think innovation will work as a stuff function. Responsibility needs to be with the businesses. Although an Innovation Office can be made responsible for driving the innovation efforts. And don&#8217;t forget to align your reward system&#8230;</p>
<p>It has also been argued that different types of innovation need different processes. So you should define what innovation outcomes you are looking for in the first place: product and services innovation, strategic innovation, business model innovation, operational innovation or management innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Matt (and for the Tweets too)! I work with a few people down here that use that type of approach, and I agree that it works well. My main concern with them is that they often end up with too much of a focus on ideation, and not enough of one on execution.  Still, they&#039;re definitely a type of tool that is worth including in the innovation mix!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Matt (and for the Tweets too)! I work with a few people down here that use that type of approach, and I agree that it works well. My main concern with them is that they often end up with too much of a focus on ideation, and not enough of one on execution.  Still, they&#8217;re definitely a type of tool that is worth including in the innovation mix!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Perez</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>From our own experience, Innovation Games are a great mechanism for getting everyone involved with innovation.  We just used two of them to identify and prioritize the values *lived* in Nearsoft and the results were well beyond our expectations.  We wrote a blog post about it, http://www.nearsoft.com/blog.

http://www.innovationgames.com/

(disclosure: Innovation Games is our client--but I am speaking from experience using them, not as a shill).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From our own experience, Innovation Games are a great mechanism for getting everyone involved with innovation.  We just used two of them to identify and prioritize the values *lived* in Nearsoft and the results were well beyond our expectations.  We wrote a blog post about it, <a href="http://www.nearsoft.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.nearsoft.com/blog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.innovationgames.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.innovationgames.com/</a></p>
<p>(disclosure: Innovation Games is our client&#8211;but I am speaking from experience using them, not as a shill).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Networks to Spread Ideas &#171; Networks &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Networks to Spread Ideas &#171; Networks &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>[...] Talks        &#171; Who is Responsible for Innovation? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Talks        &laquo; Who is Responsible for Innovation? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2009/12/who-is-responsible-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=906#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by timkastelle: Blog post - Who is responsible for #Innovation?  Innovation teams v. distributed innovation http://bit.ly/6g7cqV...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by timkastelle: Blog post &#8211; Who is responsible for #Innovation?  Innovation teams v. distributed innovation <a href="http://bit.ly/6g7cqV.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6g7cqV..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

